
When “Done” Isn’t Done
Five models attempted a physical clearing and wiping task. Across 150 scored trials, none completed it. The partial results and completion claims tell a more revealing story.
Read article
Coop runs independent, industry-informed benchmarks on real robots. Compare model checkpoints, understand failures, and measure progress with each release.


Working with researchers from
Our second benchmark
150 scored trials across five models.2 / 3 objects placed · 0% ink erased
Illustrative trials at 8× speed. Results beneath each clip refer to that trial only. Starting conditions differ. Each run failed the full-task criteria.
How we benchmark
Industry operators inform what we test. Model developers use the results to improve their policies. Every evaluation defines the robot configuration, task conditions, and scoring rules upfront.
Industry workflows inform the tasks and success criteria. With your team, we agree on the protocol, confirm hardware compatibility, and select the checkpoints to evaluate.
Run compatible checkpoints on the same robot with matched starting conditions and documented resets. Record successes, failures, and interventions to make comparisons useful.
Get task-level comparisons, failure analysis, and trial recordings to guide your next development cycle. Repeat the evaluation as your model evolves; findings apply to the tested hardware and configuration.
The Coop journal
The questions, methods, and physical work behind our benchmarks.

A high-level motor controller for the Unitree R1 did not exist. So we built it. Spur keeps the robot balanced while its arms and hands work, plans every motion before anything moves, and is now open source.
Read article
Four models, one humanoid, 220 trials. What a DO NOT ENTER sign revealed about instruction following, physical execution and reported success.
Read article
Why physical evaluation matters, where simulation falls short, and what benchmark saturation hides.
Read article